Case Summary
The plaintiff, Manoharan, was absent and did not adduce any evidence in the case against the defendants, Rajan and Chandramathi. The court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear or provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and had not adduced any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manoharan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chandramathi
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreekanth Soman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- PS. Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manoharan vs Rajan, Chandramathi regarding default dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Manoharan vs Rajan, Chandramathi regarding default dismissal.