Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 420/2022

Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd. vs Priya Varma regarding realization of payment for advertising services.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 22 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd, is seeking to recover a balance payment of Rs. 40,000 for advertising services rendered to the defendant, Priya Varma. The defendant argues that the payments were made by her husband's proprietorship firm, De Fab In Style, and denies personal liability.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the defendant does not owe any amount to the plaintiff, as the payments were the responsibility of the proprietorship De Fab In Style, not Priya Varma personally.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court established that the business transactions were conducted between the plaintiff and De Fab In Style, not with the defendant personally.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) HIG 27 Panampally Nagar, cochin – 682 036

Defendants

Priya Varma (40 years years) Defab in Style, NH Byepass Vytilla, Kochi – 682 032

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 40,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization for the Managing Director to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Release Orders
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Work orders issued for advertisement by the defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice calling for payment of outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response to the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Advertisement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of advertisement published by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advertisement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of advertisement featuring the defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: GST Registration
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate proving the proprietorship of De Fab In Style.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Account Verification Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document proving existence of De Fab In Style's current account.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: WhatsApp Messages
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of harassment and misuse of relationship by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/04/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases