Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 30/2025

Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs PRINCE MOHAN. P. M regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a suit for realization of money. The plaintiff, Canara Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Prince Mohan, for recovery of a loan amounting to ₹43,009 that the defendant failed to repay.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount claimed from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹43,009 with interest at 9.15% per annum from the date of suit till date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount claimed from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
PRINCE MOHAN. P. M
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application form, Sanction Memorandum, Cash Credit Agreement, Pronote, Letter of Proprietorship, Loan Application Form, Sanction of renewal of Working Capital Limit, Letter of Renewal, Copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment, Statement of the Loan Account and Certificate from the Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Remesan Katayam Kottummal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Haritha. O. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 43,009 with interest at 9.15% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 43,009 (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Three Thousand and Nine only) with interest @ 9.15% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sanction of renewal of Working Capital Limit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A9 (a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of the Loan Account and Certificate from the Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented by the plaintiff for realizing the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs PRINCE MOHAN. P. M regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs PRINCE MOHAN. P. M regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won