Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.444/2020

Case between Makkar vs Shaju Joseph regarding rejection of suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Makkar, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Shaju Joseph. The court rejected the suit under order 7 rule 11 CPC due to BCF not being remitted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit filed by Makkar against Shaju Joseph due to procedural issues.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Makkar (65 years years) Chittethukudy House, Nilanampadi Bhagam, Nooleli Kara, Asamannoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Shaju Joseph (40 about years years) Parakkunnel House, Pulinthanam Kara, Enanelloor Village, Muvattupuzha Thaluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Evidence:
BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases