Case Summary
Makkar, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Shaju Joseph. The court rejected the suit under order 7 rule 11 CPC due to BCF not being remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit filed by Makkar against Shaju Joseph due to procedural issues.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was rejected as the BCF was not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Makkar
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaju Joseph
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Maitheen M. Pareeth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sabu P. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajimi Abdulla
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jose C. V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Evidence:
BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2020