Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.229/2022

Case between Maker Village vs M/s Exploride Technologies Private Limited et al regarding Realization Of Money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-03
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 09/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Maker Village, provided a seed loan to the first defendant, Exploride Technologies, which has not been repaid. The case involves a demand for repayment of this loan amount along with interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,18,800/- along with interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence presented by the plaintiff established their claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence presented by the plaintiff established their claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A6 established his case as pleaded by him. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim, I learn that same remains uncontroverted and accordingly admitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,18,800/- (Rupees six lakhs eighteen thousand eight hundred only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maker Village
Relation
represented by its Director. Dr. Elizabeth Sherly
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Exploride Technologies Private Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Sunil Vallath
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Prasad Vellat Sasikumar
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Deed agreement dated 10.01.2018, Original personal guarantee agreement dated 10.01.2018, Statement of accounts issued from Canara Bank, Kazhakuttam Branch, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 30.10.2020 issued to the defendants.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pirappancode V.S. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akash S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Megha A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.S. Varalakshmi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha Priya C.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs.6,18,800 from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,18,800 from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the loan amount at 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.6,18,800 from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the loan amount at 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.6,18,800 from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to be realized from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Seed Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original deed agreement establishing the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Personal guarantee agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Guarantees repayment of the loan by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of accounts showing the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certification of the bank statement.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the 1st defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the 2nd defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the 3rd defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Maker Village vs M/s Exploride Technologies Private Limited et al regarding Realization Of Money.
Case Code Year
Case between Maker Village vs M/s Exploride Technologies Private Limited et al regarding Realization Of Money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 02/20/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Laly Rajan et al vs GIC Housing Finance Ltd. et al regarding mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pradeep K vs Nila Homes (P) Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.D. Premnath vs M/s. Jaihind Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Parka International, M/s Tag Retial Services vs Hannah Miriam Abraham regarding Suit for money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Radhakrishnan M U et al vs Santhosh Kumar P P regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won