Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.311/2023

Case between Majeesh.P.Abraham vs M/s Purva Eternity Apartment Owners Association et al regarding suit not pressed.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-15
Duration
Case Code No.
311
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Majeesh.P.Abraham filed a suit against M/s Purva Eternity Apartment Owners Association and other defendants. The suit was not pressed and was consequently dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Majeesh.P.Abraham
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Purva Eternity Apartment Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Thayathidavan Gopalan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Sreedharan Ambatt
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochurani Francis
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Dilip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pradeep.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.N. Vijayan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Cherian Karippaparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Mohan Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajesh Cherian Karippaparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jiji Nikhil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.U. Ziyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted suit not pressed. Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won