Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 106/2025

Case between Mahinsha vs Mariya George et al regarding trespassing and property damage

Court
The Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-05-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mahinsha is the plaintiff against Mariya George and C.A. George regarding issues of trespassing and property damage. The court has provided an order to restrict the defendants from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ordered the respondents to refrain from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property, alienating it, or damaging the installed waste pipes.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the respondents to refrain from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property, alienating it, or damaging the installed waste pipes.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to restrain the defendants based on the plaintiff's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds to restrain the defendants based on the plaintiff's claims.
Supporting Evidence
The court found sufficient grounds to restrain the defendants based on the plaintiff's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

Respondents are restrained from trespassing into plaint B schedule property, alienating plaint schedule property and also from committing any damage to the waste pipes installed in the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahinsha
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mariya George
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.A. George
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Jayapalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neepa Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from trespassing into plaint B schedule property, alienating plaint schedule property and also from committing any damage to the waste pipes installed in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Respondents are restrained from trespassing into plaint B schedule property, alienating plaint schedule property and also from committing any damage to the waste pipes installed in the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahinsha vs Mariya George et al regarding trespassing and property damage
Case Code Year
Case between Mahinsha vs Mariya George et al regarding trespassing and property damage

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won