Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 172 OF 2018

Case between Madappally Safiya et al vs Mohamedali et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition suit filed by Madappally Safiya and others against Mohamedali and others. A compromise was reached and accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a compromise in the suit and decreed it according to the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a compromise in the suit and decreed it according to the terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise was deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise accepted vide order in IA 1640/19. Verified the terms of compromise. Compromise is lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed as per the terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madappally Safiya
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nihamathunnisa
Party Age
27
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Salma
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohamedali
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khadeeja
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saleem
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Noufal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Mujeeb Rahman.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Noufal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise recorded and suit decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise accepted vide order in IA 1640/19. Verified the terms of compromise. Compromise is lawful. Compromise recorded. Suit decreed as per the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madappally Safiya et al vs Mohamedali et al regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Madappally Safiya et al vs Mohamedali et al regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won