Case Summary
The case involves a petition for modification of a previous court order between the petitioners M. A. Salim and Seena Ashraf and the respondents Aboobacker P.S., Suhara Muhammed, Shamsudheen P. S., Naseema Abdhul Jalal, Basith Saith, Fathima Parveen, and Isha Nazrin. The modification seeks to accurately reflect a compromise arrangement between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Modification of the previous court order to allow temporary fencing and maintenance of the locked gate arrangement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for modification was allowed, and the previous order was corrected to accurately reflect the arrangement made by the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was acted upon, and both parties had no objection to the modifications.
The compromise was acted upon, and both parties had no objection to the modifications.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
As the compromise was acted upon and both parties have no objection, it is just and proper to correct the order so as to give effect to the true arrangement between them.
Judgment Evidence:
In the above terms, the petition is allowed and the order dated 01.08.2025 in I.A. No. 77/2025 is reviewed and modified.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M. A. Salim
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Seena Ashraf
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker P.S.
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhara Muhammed
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsudheen P. S.
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naseema Abdhul Jalal
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Basith Saith
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hashim Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Sajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. A. Ajmal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. M. Alias
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. V. Shiji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Modification of the earlier order allowing temporary fencing and maintaining the locked gate.
Evidence:
As the compromise was acted upon and both parties have no objection, it is just and proper to correct the order so as to give effect to the true arrangement between them.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M. A. Salim et al vs Aboobacker P.S. et al regarding modification of court order
Case Code Year
Case between M. A. Salim et al vs Aboobacker P.S. et al regarding modification of court order