Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No.299/2019

Case between M M Salim vs Muhammad Faisal regarding temporary injunction for property rights.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, M M Salim and M M Jamal, and the defendant, Muhammad Faisal, regarding the rights to tap rubber trees on a property. The plaintiffs claim ownership of the property while the defendant asserts his right to the rubber trees on the grounds of a counterclaim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition permitting the defendant to tap rubber trees on the property in question, considering the potential for irreparable damage if not permitted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to tap rubber trees standing in the counterclaim schedule item No. 1 property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored his claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The petitioner is permitted to tap the rubber trees standing in the counterclaim schedule item No. 1 property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M M Salim (Age not specified years) Valyaparambil House, Kaithakkadu Kara, Pattimattam Village M M Jamal (Age not specified years) Valyaparambil House, Kaithakkadu Kara, Pattimattam Village

Defendants

Muhammad Faisal (Age not specified years) Marottikkal House, Ambunadu Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is permitted to tap the rubber trees standing in the counterclaim schedule item No. 1 property.
Evidence:
Considering these aspects, and having regard to the fact that any continued obstruction to the tapping of rubber trees may result in irreversible damage, it is felt that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of interim relief.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale Deed No. 3577/1994 of SRO, Puthencruz.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the tax receipt dated 28/07/2011.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Settlement Deed No. 437/2008 of SRO, Puthencruz.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Partition Deed No. 5066/2016 of SRO, Puthencruz.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report dated 29/07/2019.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report dated 03/06/2025.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sale Deed No. 2234/1970 of SRO, Puthencruz.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of the tax receipt dated 21/01/1984.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases