Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.818/2017

Case between Liz Baby et al vs O.V. Antony et al regarding declaration of civil death of O.V. Paulose

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-08-21
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months 15 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Liz Baby, Thushar Baby, and Dhilor Baby, are the heirs seeking a declaration of civil death for their missing relative O.V. Paulose, who has been absent for over 47 years. The defendants, including O.V. Antony, support the plaintiffs' claims.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs regarding their legal status as heirs, permitting a presumption of the civil death of O.V. Paulose, but did not grant a formal declaration of civil death.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs regarding their legal status as heirs, permitting a presumption of the civil death of O.V. Paulose, but did not grant a formal declaration of civil death.
Key Reasoning:
The court recognized the absence of O.V. Paulose for more than seven years, justifying the presumption of his death.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court recognized the absence of O.V. Paulose for more than seven years, justifying the presumption of his death.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs and defendants are the sole legal heirs of aforementioned O.V. Paulose, and he was not heard for more than 7 years by them or by any of their family members.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: It is declared that the plaintiffs and defendants are the legal heirs of O.V Paulose and owner of property covered by document No. 330/2015 of SRO Thrippunithura.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Liz Baby
Party Age
60
Relation
W/e Late O.V. Baby
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thushar Baby
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Late Baby
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhilor Baby
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o Late Baby
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lissy Mathew
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o Late O.P.Varkey
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
O.V. Antony
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o. Late O.P. Varkey
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nisha Antony
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o. Late O.V. Antony
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arsha Antony
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o. Vijai Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhish Antony
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o. O.V. Antony
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adhish Antony
Party Age
30
Plaintiffs Documents
Death certificate of Leela Varkey, Death certificate of O.P Varkey, Death certificate of Sosa Varkey, Death certificate of Baby O.V, Partition deed No.330/2015, Legal heirship certificate of Baby, Gazette publication, Relationship certificate of Baby O.V.
Defendants Documents
Death certificate of O.V. Antony, Legal heirship Certificate of O.V. Antony

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.B. Sandeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priya B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Surjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishal ajayan V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is declared that the plaintiffs and defendants are the legal heirs of O.V Paulose and owner of property covered by document No. 330/2015 of SRO Thrippunithura.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed in part as follows: It is declared that the plaintiffs and defendants are the legal heirs of O.V Paulose and owner of property covered by document No. 330/2015 of SRO Thrippunithura.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of death certificate of Leela Varkey issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of death certificate of O.P. Varkey issued by Vadavucode - Puthen Cruz Panchayath.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of death certificate of Sosa Varkey issued by Thripunithura Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of death certificate of Baby O.V. issued by Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayath.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original petition Deed No.330/2015 of SRO Tripunithura.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Legal heirship Certificate of Baby O.V., Issued by Kanayannur Taluk.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Gazette Publication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Gazatte Publication.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Relationship Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of relationship certificate of Baby O.V. issued by Kunnathunad Village Office.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original of death certificate of O.V. Antony issued by Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayath.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original Legal heirship Certificate of O.V. Antony issued by Kanayannur Taluk.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Liz Baby et al vs O.V. Antony et al regarding declaration of civil death of O.V. Paulose
Case Code Year
Case between Liz Baby et al vs O.V. Antony et al regarding declaration of civil death of O.V. Paulose

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/21/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Roy J Vayalatty vs Thomas J Vayalattu et al regarding interim prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won