O.S. No. 93/2018

Case between Leelakutty et al vs Thankamma et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM

Judge

Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran

Order Date

2025-01-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Leelakutty and Sreela, while the defendants include Thankamma, Sivan, Vijayan, Ravi, Reghu, and Suma. The case was heard but ultimately dismissed due to the plaintiffs not being present and not ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their lack of readiness for evidence.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present their case.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Leelakutty
Party Age: 68
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sreela
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Thankamma
Party Age: 70
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sivan
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vijayan
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ravi
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Reghu
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being present and not ready for evidence.

Evidence: