Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 174 OF 2015

Case between Leela vs Asokan regarding eviction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-28
Duration
2 years 3 months 27 days
Case Closed
Sat, 10/28/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leela filed a suit for eviction against Asokan. The suit was compromised, with Asokan vacating the room and agreeing to pay damages to Leela.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for eviction was decreed as per the terms of the compromise between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction decree
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for eviction was decreed as per the terms of the compromise between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was decreed based on the lawful compromise reached between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for eviction. IA 2482/17 is filed by plaintiff and defendants compromising the suit claim. As per the compromise the defendant vacated the plaint schedule room and handed over its key to the plaintiff. Defendant has agreed to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.40,000/- towards damages for use and occupation within 4 months from the date of compromise petition. Since the terms of the compromise is lawful suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise. Compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
61
Relation
Daughter of Parvathy Amma
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asokan
Party Age
46
Relation
Son of Kumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition
Defendants Documents
Compromise petition

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vipin Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suresh.A.Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for eviction as per compromise terms.
Evidence:
Suit for eviction. As per the compromise the defendant vacated the plaint schedule room and handed over its key to the plaintiff. Defendant has agreed to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.40,000/- towards damages for use and occupation within 4 months from the date of compromise petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Eviction Suit
Case Code
Case between Leela vs Asokan regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Leela vs Asokan regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 06/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 10/28/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Moideenkutty @ Kunhava Haji vs Puthenpeediyan Ali regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Pookunhiyakath Beeran Haji vs C.T. Shuhad regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Ponnani Ma oonathool Islam Association et al vs K.K. Usman regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won