Case Summary
Multiple petitioners filed a restoration petition against respondent Faizal, which was allowed conditionally on payment of a cost of Rs.3000 and filing a written statement by a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was allowed conditionally on payment of a cost of Rs.3000 and filing of a written statement within the specified deadline.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to respondent on or before 4-4-2010.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prabhu
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manikandan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faizal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Vijayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Noufal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of the petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition allowed conditionally on payment of cost Rs.3000 and filing the written statement by specified date.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to respondent on or before 4-4-2010.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2016