Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restor.Ptn 216/2016

Case between Leela et al vs Faizal regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2016-04-04
Duration
0 years, 2 months, 24 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Multiple petitioners filed a restoration petition against respondent Faizal, which was allowed conditionally on payment of a cost of Rs.3000 and filing a written statement by a specified date.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition was allowed conditionally on payment of a cost of Rs.3000 and filing of a written statement within the specified deadline.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to respondent on or before 4-4-2010.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leela (0 years) Puthupalli amsom, Thrithallur desom, Tirur Taluk Prabhu (0 years) Puthupalli amsom, Thrithallur desom, Tirur Taluk Manikandan (0 years) Puthupalli amsom, Thrithallur desom, Tirur Taluk Prasi (0 years) Puthupalli amsom, Thrithallur desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Faizal (0 years) Purathur amsom, Muttannur desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of the petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition allowed conditionally on payment of cost Rs.3000 and filing the written statement by specified date.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to respondent on or before 4-4-2010.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/11/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases