Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.49/2024

Case between Leela Babu vs Varghese et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration
Case Code No.
49
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leela Babu is the plaintiff in this civil suit, and Varghese along with others are the defendants. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was absent, and as no steps were taken, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent, and as no steps were taken, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Name called absent. Since plaintiff is absent and no steps taken.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff is absent and no steps taken. Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela Babu
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jacob
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sivan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. R. Sudheer & K. P. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff is absent and no steps taken. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won