O S 145/2018

Case between Latha.P.S. vs Premalatha et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM

Judge

Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran

Order Date

2025-01-04

Duration

approximately-6 years 9 days

Case Closed

Sat, 01/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha.P.S. is the plaintiff against Premalatha and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's failure to present evidence.

Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.

Supporting Evidence

The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore the suit is also dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Latha.P.S.
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Premalatha
Party Age: 40
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Gadha
Party Age: 17
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Alku
Party Age: 5
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Haridas
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P.Rajeev
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: George Joseph
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R.Gaganan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence: