Case Summary
This case involves Lalithamma as the plaintiff who filed for a Declaration and Injunction against the defendant Ratnamani. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of evidence presented.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lalithamma
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratnamani
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhiraj Sundar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nazeer Kakkanttayyam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for declaration.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s. 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction.
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s. 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020