Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 420 OF 2014

Case between Kuroor Hamza et al vs Pandarathoppil Koya's Children et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,E B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for injunction filed by Kuroor Hamza's heirs against Pandarathoppil Koya's children. A compromise petition was filed by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit according to the lawful terms of compromise agreed upon by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit according to the lawful terms of compromise agreed upon by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since the terms of compromise is lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is hereby decreed according to the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunheevi
Relation
W/o. Deceased Kuroor Hamza
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
47
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sirajudheen
Party Age
45
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
43
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saleena
Party Age
35
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhrabi
Party Age
44
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rukhiya
Party Age
41
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheeda
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khadeeja
Party Age
31
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nafeesu
Party Age
61
Relation
Mother of defendants No. 1 to 4
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E. Mohammed Rafi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.M. Rafeek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit for injunction decreed according to the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful suit is hereby decreed according to the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kuroor Hamza et al vs Pandarathoppil Koya's Children et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kuroor Hamza et al vs Pandarathoppil Koya's Children et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won