O.S. No. 402/2014

Case between Kuriakose vs Paulose regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Alshari A.

Order Date

2025-02-01

Duration

Case Closed

Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kuriakose, was involved in a suit against the defendant, Paulose. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear to provide evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear to provide evidence in court.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff not present. Called absent. Plaintiff not turned up to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kuriakose
Party Age: 80
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Paulose
Party Age: 70
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sonnet Paul
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Ciju I.S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Basil Kuriakose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Anu Mathew
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: T.K. Joy
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Benny Varghese
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence:

Plaintiff not present. Called absent. Plaintiff not turned up to adduce evidence. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification