Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 329 OF 2016

Case between Kurappam Veettil Rajan vs Fathima, Muhammed @ Mon regarding injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kurappam Veettil Rajan filed a suit for injunction against Fathima and Muhammed @ Mon. The case involved a compromise that was deemed lawful by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The ex parte order against the defendants was set aside. The suit was decreed as per the lawful terms of compromise between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kurappam Veettil Rajan (57 years years) Purathoor Panchayath, Purathoor amsom, desom, Purathoor Post, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Fathima (45 years years) Purathoor Panchayath, Purathoor amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. Muhammed @ Mon (55 years years) Purathur amsom, desom

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
the suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases