Case Summary
Kurappam Veettil Rajan filed a suit for injunction against Fathima and Muhammed @ Mon. The case involved a compromise that was deemed lawful by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The ex parte order against the defendants was set aside. The suit was decreed as per the lawful terms of compromise between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kurappam Veettil Rajan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed @ Mon
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- H/o 1st defendant
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. Arun Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
the suit is hereby decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kurappam Veettil Rajan vs Fathima, Muhammed @ Mon regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Kurappam Veettil Rajan vs Fathima, Muhammed @ Mon regarding injunction.