Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 2208 / 1997

Case between Kunjukutty et al vs Simon et al regarding impleadment of additional plaintiff.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-06
Duration
Case Code No.
2208
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kunjukutty and others as petitioners who filed a petition to implead a third petitioner as an additional plaintiff in the suit against Simon and others. The court dismissed the petition as the presence of the third petitioner was deemed unnecessary for adjudication.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to add a third plaintiff was dismissed by the court as their presence was not deemed necessary.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to add a third plaintiff was dismissed by the court as their presence was not deemed necessary.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the presence of the third petitioner was unnecessary for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
From the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the petition this court is satisfied that the presence of third petitioner is not necessary for the adjudication of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjukutty
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopi
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumar.K.K
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Simon
Party Age
93
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Mary
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob.P.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Eapen Mathai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mathai Eapen Vettath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.G.Vishnu Nambothiri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petitioners requested permission to implead the third petitioner as additional third plaintiff in the suit.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
1997

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/1997 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won