Case Summary
Kunhipathuimma and others are the decree holders, while Siddeekh is the judgment debtor. The court dealt with the execution of a decree in this matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that delivery is effected and the execution petition stands closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP stands closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhipathuimma
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parambat Faizal
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parambat Habeeb
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Siddeekh
- Party Age
- 47
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- null
- Appearance Type
- null
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016