Case Summary
Petitioner seeks eviction of respondent from commercial building for bonafide need to conduct wholesale business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and Cost Recovery
Case Type
Rent Control Petition - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner allowed to evict respondent and obtain vacant possession of the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the premises to conduct a wholesale business.
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the premises to conduct a wholesale business.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the premises to conduct a wholesale business.
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the premises to conduct a wholesale business.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner demonstrated bonafide need for the premises to conduct a wholesale business.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: a) The respondent shall give vacant possession of the petition schedule rooms to the petitioner within one month from today. b) The petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the petition from the respondent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o Muideenkutty @ Bappu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Agreement dated 01-11-2010 (Ext.A1), Affidavit Evidence etc.
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner allowed to evict respondent from the premises.
Evidence:
The respondent shall give vacant possession of the petition schedule rooms to the petitioner within one month from today.
Relief Type:
Cost Recovery
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Cost recovery by the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the petition from the respondent.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence of the rental agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Commissioner's Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner detailing the status of the premises.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Sketch submitted by Advocate Commissioner as supporting evidence.
Reference:
C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition - Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Bonafide need for premises
Case Code
Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Suresh regarding eviction for bonafide need of premises
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Suresh regarding eviction for bonafide need of premises