Case Summary
Petitioners, including Fathima, filed a petition seeking eviction of respondent to start a Mini Super Market in the premises due to arrears in license fee and bona fide need for livelihood.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Rent Control Petition - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioners were entitled to eviction based on arrears in license fee and bona fide need for livelihood.
Petitioners were entitled to eviction based on arrears in license fee and bona fide need for livelihood.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Fathima (51 years)
Not mentioned
Muhammed Afeekh (33 years)
Not mentioned
Ashik (2 years)
Not mentioned
Hanna (16 years)
Not mentioned
Defendants
Hamza (41 years)
Thiruthiyattil House, Post Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondent from the petition schedule property
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Revoking license due to arrears in fee
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documenting correspondence
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response to revocation of license
Reference:
A3