Case Summary
Kunhimoidu filed a suit against Hussain for the realisation of an amount. However, the plaintiff was absent at the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff name called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhimoidu
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hussain
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned.
Defendants Documents
None mentioned.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.P.Hussain
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Majeed Kalappattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff name called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Realisation of amount
Case Code
Case between Kunhimoidu vs Hussain regarding realisation of amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhimoidu vs Hussain regarding realisation of amount.