Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 161 OF 2016

Case between Kunhimohammed et al vs Ansarul Islam Committee et al regarding damages and injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-09-20
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Tue, 09/20/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed suit seeking damages and injunction against the Ansarul Islam Committee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint as no balance court fee was deposited, under Order 7 Rule 11.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Damages and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint as no balance court fee was deposited, under Order 7 Rule 11.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for damages and injunction. No Balance Court Fee is seen deposited. Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhimohammed
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o. Mohammedkutty
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Assain
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Alavikutty
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beeran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o. Beerankutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ansarul Islam Committee
Relation
Represented by its Secretary, C.H. Mohammedali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kattumadhathil Muhammed
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o. Moideen, President, Keezhmuri Juma Masjid
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Shareef
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Majeed Kalappattil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking damages
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee is seen deposited. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee is seen deposited. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Damages and Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunhimohammed et al vs Ansarul Islam Committee et al regarding damages and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhimohammed et al vs Ansarul Islam Committee et al regarding damages and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 09/20/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/20/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 09/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Fri, 09/30/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Committee

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs K.Gangadharan regarding Easementary Prohibitory Injunction
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Easementary Prohibitory Injunction Dismissed
Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Arichali Muhammed's children, Ayishakutty and Pathummakutty vs Chinnambat Muhammed's daughter, Aminakutty regarding partition deed and boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Fixation of Boundary and Perpetual Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Abul Kareem Haji et al vs Ansarul Islam Committee et al regarding injunction matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won