Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 48 OF 2016

Case between Kunhimarakkar.C.P. vs Padikkaparambil Musthafa regarding eviction for commercial purposes

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
approximately 2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondent residing in a building he intends to demolish for a commercial venture of Books, Sports items, and Cool and Snacks bar.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction under Section 11 (3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1965.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order, rent arrears payment, and costs of the proceeding
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner demonstrated genuine need for eviction for commercial purposes and lack of alternative space.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition stands allowed u/s 11 (3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1965.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhimarakkar.C.P. (47 years) Chekkintepurakkal Veedu, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom & Post Vakkad, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 502

Defendants

Padikkaparambil Musthafa (40 years) Quarters, Near North side of T.M.G College, Vakkad, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 502

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction order for the respondent to vacate the premises within 1 month, pay rent arrears, and bear the costs of the proceeding.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction u/s 11 (3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated communication with the respondent regarding the intended eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response to the counter-allegations made by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 08/29/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases