Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) NO. 29 OF 2017

Case between Kunhikadeeja et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding permission to sue as in forma pauperis

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-12-09
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Mon, 12/09/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two petitioners sought permission to sue as in forma pauperis which was dismissed due to their absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitioners' request for permission to sue as in forma pauperis was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Petition for Permission to Sue as in Forma Pauperis
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners' request for permission to sue as in forma pauperis was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhikadeeja
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o. Muhammed Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naseera
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o. Saleem
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gafoor
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o Koya (late)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Krtty's Health Care
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kollathedath Sureshbabu
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o. Tamu Master
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o. Vadakkathil Balan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salmath
Relation
W/o. P.T.Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Muhammed Sakkariya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Sreehari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permission to sue as in forma pauperis
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition dismissed due to default of the petitioners.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Petition for Permission to Sue as in Forma Pauperis
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunhikadeeja et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding permission to sue as in forma pauperis
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhikadeeja et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding permission to sue as in forma pauperis

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 12/09/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/09/2019 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nadambadi Santhakumari vs Secretary regarding unspecified matter
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Dispute Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won