Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Kunhachumma and others, filed a suit for a mandatory injunction against the defendant, Saidalavi. The court dismissed the suit as per Razi.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for mandatory injunction filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as per Razi.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhachumma
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sirajudheen
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shafeekh
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
IA 186/2019, IA 187/2019
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff filed for a mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as per Razi.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunhachumma et al vs Saidalavi regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhachumma et al vs Saidalavi regarding mandatory injunction