O.S No.277/2009

Case between Kumaran et al vs M.A.Sudhakaran et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam

Judge

Smt. Jyothi Babu R.

Order Date

2025-01-06

Duration

approximately-15 years 6 months

Case Closed

Mon, 01/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Kumaran and three additional parties, while the defendants include M.A.Sudhakaran and his children. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff for giving evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear for evidence. The court ruled in favor of the defendants.

Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff is not present for giving evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kumaran
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vinod Kumar
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sindhu Pradeep
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Manju Saiju

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.A.Sudhakaran
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Arun
Party Age: 27
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Akhila
Party Age: 18
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.C. Skariah
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Geethu C.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.

Evidence: