Case Summary
Krishnan C A is the plaintiff, while Ammini and others are the defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the court dismissing the case for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnan C A
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ammini
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kochukunju
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kutty
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rama
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P G Dileepkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lathiya Gopalan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M K Jayapalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C R Gayathri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnan C A vs Ammini et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnan C A vs Ammini et al regarding suit dismissed for default.