Case Summary
Krishna Prasad and Neethu are involved in a civil suit. The case was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the memo.
The plaintiff did not press the memo.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the memo.
The plaintiff did not press the memo.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not press the case.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit having been finally heard on 26/06/2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Submitted that not press memo filed. Hence, suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishna Prasad
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neethu
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- H Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Biji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Govindan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K O Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Submitted that not press memo filed. Hence, suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishna Prasad vs Neethu regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Krishna Prasad vs Neethu regarding suit dismissal