Case Summary
The plaintiffs, K.P Unnikrishnan Nair and Mathukutty Joseph, are members of the Y’s Mens Club of Kanjirappally and are challenging the validity of the club's recent elections, alleging procedural violations. The defendants, representing the same club, deny the allegations and contend that the club is not operating as claimed by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed, with the court ruling that the plaintiffs failed to prove their case regarding the election and their membership in the club.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs could not establish their claims about the election procedures and their status as club members.
The plaintiffs could not establish their claims about the election procedures and their status as club members.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs could not establish their claims about the election procedures and their status as club members.
The plaintiffs could not establish their claims about the election procedures and their status as club members.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence on records are insufficient to prove the allegations raised by the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. Considering the nature and contentions in the case, the parties are directed to bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.P Unnikrishnan Nair
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathukutty Joseph @ Mathew Joseph
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Y’s Mens Club of Kanjirappally International
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Job K. Vettom
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy Joseph
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reji
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Receipt No.125 of Rs.300/- showing subscription of 1st plaintiff for the period 2019-2020, Receipt No.108 of Rs.2400/- showing subscription of 2nd plaintiff for the period 2021-2022.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.S Ninan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.K Kuriakose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Benny Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kiran Sankar .T
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Request for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence the issues are answered against the plaintiffs.
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Request for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to conduct a general body meeting for elections.
Evidence:
The evidence on records are insufficient to prove the allegations raised by the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing subscription of 1st plaintiff for the period 2019-2020 in Y’s Mens Club, Kanjirappally.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing subscription of 2nd plaintiff for the period 2021-2022 in Y’s Mens Club, Kanjirappally.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2021