Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 28/2025

Case between Devasya Antony vs Molly Babu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration
approximately-0 days
Case Code No.
28
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Devasya Antony filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against Molly Babu and Shibin Babu. The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in his favour.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing on the property and committing any waste therein.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing on the property and committing any waste therein.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in his favour.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
From the records on file, the court is satisfied that plaintiff has a primafacie case and balance of convenience is in his favour.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence respondents are restrained from trespassing on the plaint schedule property, demolishing the Kayyala and committing any waste therein, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devasya Antony
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Molly Babu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibin Babu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jyothish Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.K. Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary prohibitory injunction against the respondents.
Evidence:
Hence respondents are restrained from trespassing on the plaint schedule property, demolishing the Kayyala and committing any waste therein, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Ajitha Krishnankutty vs Manager regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson Varghese vs Manager, Tata Motors Finance Solutions Ltd. et al regarding suit not pressed.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.P Unnikrishnan Nair et al vs Y’s Mens Club of Kanjirappally International regarding invalidating election, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bency John @ Maryamma vs George Jacob, Shanty Abraham George et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown