Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 495/2022

Case between Korah C George vs Managing Director, Dishnet wirelesss limited et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
Case Code No.
495
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Korah C George, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against the Managing Director of Dishnet wirelesss limited and Chennai Network Infrastructure limited. The court has allowed the IA 3/2023, resulting in the suit being returned under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the IA 3/2023 and decided to return the plaint under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the IA 3/2023 and decided to return the plaint under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of arbitration as per Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of arbitration as per Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the matter should be resolved through arbitration.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 3/2023 is allowed. Plaint is returned Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Korah C George
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Managing Director, Dishnet wirelesss limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chennai Network Infrastructure limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Josekutty Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhanya. E. J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA 3/2023 is allowed.
Evidence:
IA 3/2023 is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaint is returned under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Evidence:
Plaint is returned Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Akhil Geevarghese Jose vs Soniya Mariyam Varghese et al regarding suit dismissal.
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Siby Jacob @ Sibi et al regarding suit for decree in terms of compromise
Munsiff's Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Thomas.J.S et al regarding compromise petition.
THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Shajimon Mathew vs Ayyappan et al regarding compromise petition
MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Omana Markose vs P.O Devarsykutty, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won