Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 60/2019

Case between Kochuthresia vs Binu et al regarding balance court fee not remitted

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kochuthresia, and the defendants, Binu and Rincy, were involved in a suit where the balance court fee was not remitted. The court found the plaintiff absent and rejected the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted and the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted and the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Balance court fee not remitted and plaintiff was absent.
Why Defendant Won:
Balance court fee not remitted and plaintiff was absent.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee not remitted. Plaintiff called absent. Even after the expiry of statutory period.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint stands rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kochuthresia
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rincy
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Jayapalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.N. Arunkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biji Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted. Plaintiff called absent. Even after the expiry of statutory period. Balance court fee not remitted. Hence plaint stands rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kochuthresia vs Binu et al regarding balance court fee not remitted
Case Code Year
Case between Kochuthresia vs Binu et al regarding balance court fee not remitted

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won