Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 60/2019

Case between Kochuthresia vs Binu et al regarding balance court fee not remitted

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kochuthresia, and the defendants, Binu and Rincy, were involved in a suit where the balance court fee was not remitted. The court found the plaintiff absent and rejected the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted and the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Balance court fee not remitted and plaintiff was absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint stands rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kochuthresia (72 years) Manikyathan House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Binu (41 years) Manikyathan House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Rincy (36 years) Manikyathan House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted. Plaintiff called absent. Even after the expiry of statutory period. Balance court fee not remitted. Hence plaint stands rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases