Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 59/2023

Case between K.M. Mathew et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding encroachment of property

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration
approximately-0 years 10 days
Case Code No.
59
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are concerned about the defendants allegedly attempting to widen a public road by encroaching on their property. The defendants deny this intention and agreed to maintain the status quo.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the status quo be maintained regarding the property until the suit is resolved.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Status quo to be maintained until the disposal of the suit.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the status quo be maintained regarding the property until the suit is resolved.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided valid concerns regarding encroachment, and the defendants agreed to maintain the status quo.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Learned counsel for defendant submitted that they have no intention to do so and consented to order status quo.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I.A. 2/2023 is disposed of by directing the parties to remain status quo as noted by the commissioner till disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.M. Mathew
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roji Jose
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roy Jose Alexander
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thressiamma
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Assistant Executive Engineer, P.W.D.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala Road Fund Board
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benny Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Government Pleader
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the parties to remain status quo as noted by the commissioner till disposal of the suit
Evidence:
the attempt of encroachment if any is to be restrained and the property is to be retained as such till disposal of the suit for fair adjudication of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

State of Kerala

Similar Cases

Case between Thomas Mathew K. vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jossy Thomas et al vs C. T. Chacko et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kurias Thomas et al vs Chacko Sajive regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thresiamma Philip vs The Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Travancore Devaswom Board et al vs Mundaakayam Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won