Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 472/2024

Case between Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd vs G K Iron Steel Company Ltd regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Tue, 10/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd is suing G K Iron Steel Company Ltd for the recovery of money owed on credit sales. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to an ex parte judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with the defendant ordered to pay Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd a sum of 2,99,762/- with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 2,99,762/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with the defendant ordered to pay Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd a sum of 2,99,762/- with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence of credit sales and payment history was established.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,99,762/-...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Noushad K A
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramsad K S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G K Iron Steel Company Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 19.09.2013 Memorandum of Association, A2 01.04.2022 To 31.03.2023 Ledger Account, A3 01.04.2023 To 22.02.2024 Ledger Account, A4 31.03.2023 Balance Sheet, A5 13.05.2020 Copy of Resolution, A6 05.06. Legal Notice, A7 15.07.2024 Notice, A8 18.07.2024 Registered cover with A/D Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Rabeez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reny Baby
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anakha Santhosh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adithya Benzeer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rizwan T Nazar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Treesa Sony Thoppil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 2,99,762 along with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,99,762/- (Rupees two lakhs ninety nine thousand seven hundred and sixty two only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 2,45,707/- (Rupees two lakhs forty five thousand seven hundred and seven only) from the date of decree till its realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to real costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of Association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the incorporation and details of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account detailing transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account detailing transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Balance Sheet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial statement providing an overview of the plaintiff company's financial position.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing a resolution passed by the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice related to the claim against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Registered cover with A/D Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing evidence of communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd vs G K Iron Steel Company Ltd regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kizhakkethil Steels Pvt. Ltd vs G K Iron Steel Company Ltd regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 10/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won