Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 164/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiney et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-18
Duration
approximately-14 years 4 months 18 days
Case Closed
Tue, 11/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit for the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants, who were guarantors for the loan taken by Sudeep Abraham, now deceased. The defendants were found to have defaulted on the repayment of the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay the sum of 2,20,201/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiff to be uncontroverted and established the plaintiff's claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiff to be uncontroverted and established the plaintiff's claim.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,20,201/- (Rupees two lakh twenty thousand two hundred and one only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiney
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amala
Party Age
25
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maria
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anilkumar N R
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joby P M
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Memorandum of Agreement, Acknowledgment of Debt, Acknowledgment of debt and security.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dominic D Vallavassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C L Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
James K Peter
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of ₹2,20,201/- with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,20,201/- (Rupees two lakh twenty thousand two hundred and one only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) from the date of decree till its realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the evidence to establish the loan sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms under which the defendants availed of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a record that the debt was acknowledged by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of additional acknowledgment of debt and associated securities.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further supports the claims of debt acknowledgment and security by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates ongoing acknowledgment of the debt by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed account of the transactions and outstanding balance owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiney et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiney et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabitha K Sabu et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Dileep K Ponnappan et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs M/s. Sreelakshmi Kudumbasree et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Jayamohan.K regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won