Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 45/2025

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SHAINEESH et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala Gramin Bank is involved in a suit for realization of money against the defendants, SHAINEESH and KUNHIKKANNAN, who defaulted on a vehicle loan. The bank seeks recovery of the principal amount along with interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with reduced interest. The defendants are also permitted to pay off the debt within six months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹3,18,985 with future interest at 9% per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with reduced interest. The defendants are also permitted to pay off the debt within six months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants conceded to the claim and agreed to clear the debt, prompting the court to grant the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants conceded to the claim and agreed to clear the debt, prompting the court to grant the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to clear off the decree debt within 6 months, the suit is hereby decreed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹3,18,985 with future interest @ 9% per annum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SHAINEESH
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KUNHIKKANNAN
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹3,18,985 with future interest @ 9% per annum.
Evidence:
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to clear off the decree debt within 6 months, the suit is hereby decreed.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to sell the hypothecated vehicle and adjust the sale proceeds towards the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to sell the hypothecated vehicle and is entitled to adjust the sale proceeds towards the amount due from the defendants to the plaintiff bank.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SHAINEESH et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SHAINEESH et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won