Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 228 OF 2019

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhosh kumar.K. et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants Santhosh kumar.K. and Janaki. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment, leading the bank to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due from the defendants along with interest and suit costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.40,756/- with interest at the rate of 14% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due from the defendants along with interest and suit costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff, which was unchallenged due to the defendants' absence, proved the plaintiff's case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff, which was unchallenged due to the defendants' absence, proved the plaintiff's case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint. Since the defendants remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW.1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. I. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.40,756/- (Rupees Forty Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Six only), with interest at the rate of 14% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh kumar.K.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 27-03-2014, Demand Promissory Note dated 27-03-2014, Take Delivery Letter to Demand Promissory Note dated 27-03-2014, Hypothecation Deed Regarding Composite & Integrated Loan for Non Farm Sector Activities dated 27-03-2014, Acknowledgement of Debt and Security dated 6-1-2017, Copy of the statement of accounts showing the details of the loan transaction.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Femya.T.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
I.find.no.reason.to.disbelieve.PW.1.Therefore,I.am.satisfied.that.the.plaintiff.has.proved.his.case.by.adducing.cogent.and.reliable.evidence.Hence.the.plaintiff.is.entitled.to.a.decree.as.prayed.for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff.is.entitled.to.realize.costs.of.the.suit.from.the.defendant.at.confessional.scale

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the defendants applied for a loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the promissory note executed by the defendants for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the take delivery of the promissory note by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the hypothecation related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the debt owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the loan transaction and the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhosh kumar.K. et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhosh kumar.K. et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed