Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 868/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhakumariyamma regarding agricultural loan.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Santhakumariyamma, concerning an agricultural loan. The case was presided over by Additional Munsiff Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its present Branch Manager Rajeev
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhakumariyamma
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Gazette notification, Application for agricultural loan, Loan sanction communication, Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loan, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Demand notice, Postal receipt, Statement of account for the period from 01/01/1976 to 30/07/2024, General Power of Attorney.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Justin Poulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gazette notification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application for Agricultural Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Sanction communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of account for the period from 01/01/1976 to 30/07/2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: General Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Witness examined from the Plaintiff's side.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhakumariyamma regarding agricultural loan.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Santhakumariyamma regarding agricultural loan.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sruthy Kudumbasree et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Indian Overseas Bank, Chemmakkad vs Sunil.L.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won