Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 139/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Oruma JLG et al regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-10-14
Duration
approximately-6 years 21 days
Case Closed
Tue, 10/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Oruma JLG and others for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan as per the agreement, leading to the bank initiating legal proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.2,17,479/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.2,17,479/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventeen Thousand Four Hundred and Seventy Nine Only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Oruma JLG
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy T J
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T A Chandy
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose John
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudhakaran Nair K
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Account, Original application for Joint Liability Group Loan, Original Inter-se Agreement, Original Letter of Consent cum Guarantee, Original Demand Promissory Note, Copy of Lawyer’s Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kuruvilla Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.2,17,479/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.2,17,479/-.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Account for the period 25.09.2019 to 12.03.2025 along with Certificate under Bankers Book Evidence Act. 1891
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the loan account details and repayment records.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original application for Joint Liability Group Loan Scheme
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the application made for the loan by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Inter-Se agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the agreement among the members of the Joint Liability Group regarding loans.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Letter of Consent cum Guarantee Cum Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides the guarantee for the repayment of the loan taken.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the borrower's promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges the receipt of the Demand Promissory Note.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendants about the repayment demand.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of communication sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Original acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms acknowledgment of the debt by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of debts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further confirms acknowledgment of debts related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Oruma JLG et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Oruma JLG et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 09/25/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 10/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabitha K Sabu et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Dileep K Ponnappan et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs M/s. Sreelakshmi Kudumbasree et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Jayamohan.K regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won