Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 105/2024

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs NOUSHAD regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KERALA GRAMIN BANK filed a suit against NOUSHAD and SAIJAL for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount of ₹1,21,216. The defendants claimed they did not take any loan from the bank and denied the allegations in the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff KERALA GRAMIN BANK, allowing them to recover the amount of ₹1,21,216 with future interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹1,21,216 with future interest at the rate of 9.85% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff KERALA GRAMIN BANK, allowing them to recover the amount of ₹1,21,216 with future interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NOUSHAD
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SAIJAL
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural Loans, Statement of Account, Copy of Lawyer Notice, Returned Cover with Acknowledgment Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Previn. P. M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jishine Babu. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,21,216 with future interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Kerala Gramin Bank showing the account details of Noushad.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. P. Anoop to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned cover with acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of sending the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs NOUSHAD regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs NOUSHAD regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won