Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 15 OF 2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed Khaleel et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking recovery of a loan amount from Mohammed Khaleel and Musthafa. The defendants admitted the claim and the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay a total of Rs. 4,46,171/- with interest. If the payment is not made within the stipulated time, the bank can recover the amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 4,46,171/- with interest @ 11% per annum from the date of suit till its realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay a total of Rs. 4,46,171/- with interest. If the payment is not made within the stipulated time, the bank can recover the amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, allowing the court to grant judgment on admission.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, allowing the court to grant judgment on admission.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants had admitted the plaint claim in the written statement, I am of the view that suit can be decreed on admission.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 4,46,171/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty Six Thousand One Hundred and Seventy One only) with interest @ 11 % per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
By its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Khaleel
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Vinida.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.M.V.Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 4,46,171/- with interest @ 11 % per annum from the date of suit till its realization.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 4,46,171/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty Six Thousand One Hundred and Seventy One only) with interest @ 11 % per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are permitted to pay the decree amount with an interest @ 6% per annum on the principal amount from the date of decree in installments within 1 year.
Evidence:
The defendants are permitted to pay the decree amount with an interest @ 6% per annum on the principal amount from the date of decree in installments within 1 year from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
If the defendants failed to pay the above amount within 1 year, the plaintiff can recover the amount with interest @ 11% till its realization.
Evidence:
If the defendants failed to pay the above amount within 1 year as stipulated above, the plaintiff is at a liberty to recover the amount with interest @ 11% till its realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants at confessional scale.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants at confessional scale.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed Khaleel et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed Khaleel et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 10/29/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed