Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 187 OF 2019

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Janardhanan.A.K. regarding money recovery

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Janardhanan.A.K., who defaulted on the repayment. The defendant remained absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest. The defendant's absence resulted in a ruling in favor of the bank.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 40,197/- with interest @ 11% per annum and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case with credible evidence despite the defendant's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I.Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 40,197/- (Rupees Forty Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Seven only) with interest @ 11% per annum from the date of suit till the realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Janardhanan.A.K. (51 years years) Azhakath Kalathil House, Thirunavaya amsom, P.O.Kodakkal, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 40,197/- with interest at 11% per annum.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 40,197/- (Rupees Forty Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Seven only) with interest @ 11 % per annum from the date of suit till the realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants at confessional scale.
Evidence:
II. Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants at confessional scale.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was used to show the initial request for the loan by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the terms of the loan and the agreement made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security (of Borrower and Guarantor)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the debt that the defendant has towards the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security of Borrower/Coobligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim of debt acknowledgment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal notice regarding the dues owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of statement of accounts showing details of the loan transaction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account details indicating the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Sat, 03/23/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases