Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 64/2025

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-06-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff bank filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount of ₹1,46,382 due to non-repayment. The defendants failed to appear in court despite being served summons, resulting in the case proceeding ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with interest. The defendants did not challenge the claim, leading to an ex parte decision.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹1,46,382 with future interest at the rate of 10% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with interest. The defendants did not challenge the claim, leading to an ex parte decision.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and the documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AJEESH. K. M
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
VINEESH. O
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for MSME working Capital Limits, Take Delivery Letter, Pronote, Request for overdraft facilities, Guarantee Covering Letter, Acknowledgment of debt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof. V. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,46,382 with future interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of .1,46,382 (Rupees One Lakh Forty Six Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty Two only) with future interest @ 10 % per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Penal Interest
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim of penal interest is denied.
Evidence:
However, the claim of penal interest is denied.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for MSME working Capital limits – CC & OD
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Ajeesh. K. M in favour of the Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Given to the Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Ajeesh. K. M in favour of the Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Made to the Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to the Branch Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri Branch.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the Defendants in favour of the plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security of Borrower/Coobligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
From Ajeesh. K. M to the Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri Branch.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security of Borrower/Coobligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
From Ajeesh. K. M to the Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri Branch.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. P. Anoop to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Associated with the Lawyer Notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9 (a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Associated with the Lawyer Notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9 (b)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Signed by Ajeesh. K. M.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover with Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Associated with the case.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Kerala Gramin Bank, Purameri Branch for Ajeesh. K. M.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won