Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 63 OF 2019

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Samad regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Kerala Gramin Bank filing a suit against Abdul Samad for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on repayments and the bank seeks to realize the owed money.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the amount due with interest. The defendant was found to have defaulted on the loan repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 76,588/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and defaults in payment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows I.Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 76,588/- (Rupees Seventy Six Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Eight only) with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till the realization. II.Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant at confessional scale.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years) By its Manager, Chamravattom Branch

Defendants

Abdul Samad (56 years years) Pullath House,Thriprangode amsom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the amount due with interest.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant at confessional scale.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant applied for a loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan was sanctioned by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant executed an agreement regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant acknowledged the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice was sent to the defendant regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the loan transaction were provided.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Fri, 08/02/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases