Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 63 OF 2019

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Samad regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Kerala Gramin Bank filing a suit against Abdul Samad for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on repayments and the bank seeks to realize the owed money.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the amount due with interest. The defendant was found to have defaulted on the loan repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 76,588/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the amount due with interest. The defendant was found to have defaulted on the loan repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and defaults in payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and defaults in payment.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint. Since the defendants remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW.1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows I.Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 76,588/- (Rupees Seventy Six Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Eight only) with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till the realization. II.Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant at confessional scale.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Samad
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 02-08-2013, Sanction Letter dated 02-08-2013, Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural loans dated 2-8-2013, Acknowledgement of Debt and Security dated 24.05.2016, Copy of the Lawyer Notice, dated 22.01.2019, Copy of statement of accounts showing the details of the loan transaction
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Vinida.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the amount due with interest.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant at confessional scale.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant applied for a loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan was sanctioned by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant executed an agreement regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant acknowledged the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice was sent to the defendant regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the loan transaction were provided.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Samad regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Samad regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 08/02/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed