Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
CS.14/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Ulliyeri Branch vs Surjith. AS et al regarding furnishing security for an amount of 16,43,168/-

Court
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Judge
Smt.Priyanka S.
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration
Case Code No.
14
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition against Surjith AS and others to secure an amount of 16,43,168/-. The case addresses concerns that the respondents may dispose of property to delay execution of the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the respondents to either furnish security for the specified amount or show cause for not doing so. A conditional order of attachment on the petition schedule property was also passed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional order of attachment on petition schedule property
Case Type
Commercial Case
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the respondents to either furnish security for the specified amount or show cause for not doing so. A conditional order of attachment on the petition schedule property was also passed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondents were found likely to dispose of property to delay the execution of the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Respondents were found likely to dispose of property to delay the execution of the decree.
Supporting Evidence
It is satisfied that, respondent with a view to delay the execution of the decree, which would be passed in the above suit, is about to dispose of their property.

Judgment Evidence:

In this circumstance, the respondents are directed either to furnish security for an amount of 16,43,168/- or to show cause as to why they should not furnish the security. In the meantime, a conditional order of attachment is passed over petition schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surjith. AS
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sadanandan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Narayanan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil. G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Vijayanandan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional order of attachment over petition schedule property and direction to furnish security or show cause.
Evidence:
the respondents are directed either to furnish security for an amount of 16,43,168/- or to show cause as to why they should not furnish the security.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Case Code
CS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Koyilandy
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of India vs Prasoon C regarding petition filed under Section 55 Order 21 Rule 37,38 of C.P.C.
COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Case Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sunny Varghese regarding EP. 153/2024
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Commercial Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sahadath et al regarding setting aside exparte decree
Commercial Court
Commercial Case Defendant Won
Case between South Indian Bank, Koyilandy Branch vs Aslam Kumulamkandy regarding KCC loan repayment
Court of the Judge, Commercial Court - Koyilandy
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank vs Ameer N.K et al regarding security for an amount.
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Commercial Case Plaintiff Won