Case Summary
The Federal Bank is the petitioner seeking a conditional order of attachment against the respondents, who are accused of attempting to delay the execution of a decree. The court instructed the respondents to furnish security or show cause.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional order of attachment on the petition schedule property.
Case Type
Commercial Case
Final Judgment
No
The respondents are required to either provide security or show cause regarding their property involved in the suit. A conditional order of attachment on the property has been issued.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
In this circumstance, the respondents are directed either to furnish security for an amount of 18,74,311/- or to show cause as to why he should not furnish the security. In the meantime, a conditional order of attachment is passed over petition schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Federal Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ameer N.K @ Ameer Naduvilakandy
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rashida. T
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammedkutty Haji
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.K. Manoharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Agastia Ramesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Conditional order of attachment over petition schedule property.
Evidence:
In the meantime, a conditional order of attachment is passed over petition schedule property.
Relief Type:
Security
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondents directed to furnish security for an amount of 18,74,311/- or to show cause.
Evidence:
The respondents are directed either to furnish security for an amount of 18,74,311/- or to show cause as to why he should not furnish the security.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the considerations regarding the necessity of security.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Delay in execution of decree
Case Code
CS.
Case Code Year
2025